In a decision released Tuesday, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, denying a petition from a Honduran mother and her children seeking to reopen their immigration case. The court ruled that the family failed to follow strict procedural rules when claiming their lawyer’s mistakes caused them to miss a crucial hearing.
The case centers on Maria Jose Rodriguez Irias, who entered the U.S. near San Ysidro, California, in 2019. After missing a scheduled 2023 court date, she and her children were ordered deported in their absence. Rodriguez Irias later tried to fight the order, blaming her attorney for the mix-up.
READ: Fourth Circuit Rules El Salvador Native Is US Citizen, Halts Deportation In Lopez vs. Bondi
The Missing Paperwork
Her lawyer admitted he dropped the ball. He explained that although he was hired in 2021 to help her apply for a “T visa”—a special status for human trafficking victims—he never formally told the immigration court he was representing her. Because of this, he never received the hearing notice and couldn’t tell his client when to show up.
To fix the mistake, the lawyer claimed he self-reported his errors to the Iowa Supreme Court’s disciplinary board. However, the court found a major hole in his story: he provided a copy of the email he wrote, but no proof that he actually sent it or that the board ever received it.
Rules Are Rules
Under a long-standing legal standard known as Matter of Lozada, immigrants who claim their lawyers were incompetent must prove they filed an official complaint with disciplinary authorities. The court emphasized that this isn’t just a “technicality.”
READ: Court Blocks ICE From Re-Detaining Kilmar Abrego Garcia After Failed Africa Deportation Plans
The judges explained that the rule exists to prevent “collusion,” where a lawyer and a client might pretend there was a mistake just to get a second chance at a case. Since Rodriguez Irias couldn’t prove the complaint was actually filed, the court said it couldn’t even consider the merits of her situation.
No Second Chances
Rodriguez Irias also argued that her status as a trafficking victim and her limited English should have prompted the Board of Immigration Appeals to reopen the case on its own.
The three-judge panel, led by Circuit Judge Shepherd, disagreed. They noted that the court generally doesn’t have the power to second-guess the Board’s “discretionary” decisions. Additionally, the court pointed out that even if the case were reopened, an immigration judge doesn’t have the authority to grant the T visa she was seeking.
With this ruling, the prior deportation order stands.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox
