A clash over free speech and judicial impartiality has erupted in Illinois after the Cook County Bar Association demanded the Illinois Supreme Court revoke the assignment of a retired judge, citing his conservative political commentary as disqualifying.
The dispute stems from a December 11 order by the State Supreme Court, which recalled Retired Judge James R. Brown to the bench. Citing “public necessity,” the high court assigned Brown to help clear significant backlogs in the Circuit Court of Cook County through late 2026.
But the Cook County Bar Association (CCBA) is fighting the appointment, arguing that Brown’s outspoken criticism of “progressive prosecutors” and “lawfare” against Donald Trump makes him unfit to serve.
READ: Florida And Tennessee Lawmakers Push To Permanently Enshrine ‘Anti-Communism Week’
Ideological Litmus Test?
In a letter sent to the Supreme Court this week, the CCBA flagged a September 2025 column Brown wrote for John Kass News titled, “His Judgement Cometh and That Right Soon.”
While the Supreme Court viewed Brown as a necessary asset to the judiciary, the Bar Association characterizes his writing as a danger to the “diverse fabric” of the legal community. They argue his skepticism of current progressive narratives demonstrates a “lack of civility.”
The CCBA took particular issue with Brown’s defense of the 77 million Americans who voted for Trump, whom he said had been “viciously demonized.”
They also cited his critiques of high-profile legal cases against the former President. Brown had described the prosecutions led by Alvin Bragg and Letitia James as “lawfare” funded by George Soros—a view shared by many legal conservatives but labeled by the CCBA as “inflammatory.”
READ: Trump’s IRS Blitz: Mega-Donors Like Soros Targeted In ‘Nefarious’ Funding Crackdown
Clash of Cultures
The Bar Association’s complaint extends beyond legal philosophy into cultural battles. They condemned Brown for comments regarding the 2020 riots and the “hero” status afforded to George Floyd, as well as his concerns about biological males accessing female spaces in schools.
In their request for his removal, the CCBA invoked the demographics of Cook County, noting the population includes 1.15 million Black residents and over 500,000 non-citizens. The association argues that a judge who rejects the concept of “systemic racism” or criticizes gender ideology cannot fairly administer justice to these groups.
“The Courts should be free from individuals who harvest political bias,” the CCBA wrote, asserting that Brown’s “debunked theories” violate the Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct.
READ: ‘Land Of Make-Believe’: Minnesota Senate Hopeful Hann Rips Flanagan Over Hijab, Fraud Scandal
Supreme Court Silent
The move by the CCBA raises difficult questions about the boundaries of political speech for retired jurists and whether ideological alignment is now a prerequisite for judicial service in Cook County.
Despite the Bar Association’s insistence that Brown’s conservative viewpoints effectively nullify his ability to be impartial, the Illinois Supreme Court has not rescinded the order.
As it stands, Judge Brown is set to continue his service, tasked with upholding the rule of law in a court system struggling with delays, even as local legal activists seek his ouster.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox.
