The latest dump of Jeffrey Epstein’s private files—a staggering 3.5 million pages released by the Department of Justice on January 30—has reignited a firestorm of speculation, but it’s a specific lack of action in Washington that is raising eyebrows.
During a Thursday segment of “CNN Newsnight,” host Abby Phillip found herself on the defensive when conservative commentator Scott Jennings pointed out a glaring inconsistency in how Congress is handling the fallout.
The documents recently made public link the late sex offender to a wide web of high-profile figures, including Tesla’s Elon Musk, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and former Trump advisor Steve Bannon. While the panel debated the legal ethics of pursuing those named in the files, Jennings cut through the noise with a blunt question: Why hasn’t a single lawmaker used their unique legal immunity to name names?
READ: Draining The Swamp: U.S. Hammers Iran’s ‘Shadow Fleet’ In Massive New Crackdown
Jennings noted that several members of Congress have claimed to speak directly with Epstein’s victims, allegedly hearing specific names of those involved in his sex-trafficking ring. Yet, despite the moral outrage frequently expressed on television, no representative has stepped onto the House floor to put those names into the public record.
Under the U.S. Constitution’s “Speech and Debate Clause,” lawmakers are shielded from defamation lawsuits for anything they say during official proceedings. This legal “superpower” was recently tested and upheld in March 2025, when a lawsuit against Representative Nancy Mace was tossed out after she used a House speech to accuse several men of sexual misconduct.
When Jennings asked why this protection hasn’t been used to expose Epstein’s associates, Phillip appeared momentarily taken aback, characterizing such a move as a “nuclear option.”
“Aren’t we there?” Jennings countered, gesturing to the horrific nature of the crimes involved.
Phillip pivoted the conversation, arguing that the public shouldn’t necessarily assume that everyone who emailed or associated with Epstein committed a crime. Instead, she suggested the Justice Department should “go back to the drawing board” and re-interview witnesses.
READ: Florida Sen. Ashley Moody Targets FAFSA Loophole To Stop Labeling Home-Schoolers As “Non-Graduates”
The exchange took another turn when Dan Abrams, ABC News’ chief legal analyst, pushed back on the idea that the government is dragging its feet. Abrams noted that the DOJ, regardless of which party is in power, would view the prosecution of an Epstein co-conspirator as a “prize” catch. He suggested that if the evidence were there to support criminal charges, the arrests would have already happened.
For now, the standoff remains. Millions of pages of documents are in the public eye, but the specific, actionable names that victims allegedly shared with lawmakers remain locked behind a door that no one in Washington seems willing to open—even with a Constitutional shield in hand.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox
