A Florida appeals court has intervened to block a significantly reduced sentence for a man convicted of voter fraud, ruling on Friday that a trial judge’s decision to grant a “downward departure” lacked the necessary legal footing.
Robert Henry Rivernider, Jr., who faced over 10 years in prison under state sentencing guidelines, was instead given just 180 days in jail by a lower court. That decision has now been reversed by the Fifth District Court of Appeal.
The case stems from a jury trial where Rivernider was found guilty of Forgery of a Public Record, Uttering a Forged Public Record, and Fraud in Connection with Casting a Vote.
While the current case involved a single ballot in one election, Rivernider’s extensive criminal history played a major role in the sentencing phase. Prosecutors pointed to 18 prior felony convictions for wire fraud, which resulted in a sentencing scoresheet requiring a minimum of 127.425 months—roughly 10.6 years—in state prison.
READ: Florida Pimp’s Bail Money Scheme Backfires In Polk County
During the initial sentencing, Circuit Judge David B. Eddy expressed his personal opinion that the decade-long minimum was “grossly disproportionate” for non-violent offenses that caused no economic injury.
To legally bypass the guidelines, the judge cited two statutory reasons: that the crimes were unsophisticated and isolated, and that Rivernider needed to pay restitution to victims in an unrelated federal case.
However, in a move that proved legally fatal to the sentence, the judge explicitly crossed out the word “remorse” on the official scoresheet, admitting that Rivernider had not shown regret for his actions.
The appellate court, led by Judge Wallis, found that the trial court’s logic did not meet the strict requirements of Florida law. The court noted that Florida statutes require a defendant to show remorse to qualify for a departure based on an “unsophisticated” crime.
Because the trial judge specifically found that Rivernider was not remorseful, the appeals court ruled the legal threshold was not met. Furthermore, the court found there was no evidence presented to prove that the federal victims’ need for restitution outweighed the state’s requirement for a prison sentence.
While the appellate court affirmed the underlying criminal convictions, it vacated the 180-day jail term. The case has been sent back to the Circuit Court for Sumter County for a new sentencing hearing, where Rivernider now faces a term much closer to the 10-year minimum mandated by state guidelines.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox
