The Center for Inquiry (CFI) is mobilizing Florida residents to lobby Governor Ron DeSantis to veto Senate Bill 688, a piece of legislation that would reintroduce the practice of naturopathy to the state.
Since 1959, Florida has maintained a near-total ban on the practice, but the proposed bill seeks to overturn that decades-old restriction and establish a formal regulatory framework for naturopathic practitioners.
At the heart of the debate is the creation of a Board of Naturopathic Medicine. Under the current language of S. 688, this seven-member board would be responsible for oversight and regulation, with four of those seats reserved specifically for naturopathic doctors.
Azhar Majeed, CFI’s director of government affairs and policy, expressed concern that this structure would lead to “lax and self-serving regulation,” questioning whether a board dominated by practitioners would enforce strict safety standards.
The CFI argues that the bill fails to account for the differences in training between traditional medical doctors and naturopaths.
“The bill ignores that naturopaths lack the rigorous medical education and training that real medical doctors receive, including medical school, clinical requirements, and residency programs,” Majeed stated. He further noted that without this background, practitioners might struggle to understand complex drug interactions, posing a potential risk to patient safety.
The organization also highlighted specific concerns regarding public health.
According to the CFI, some naturopathic practitioners advocate for “nosodes”—homeopathic preparations—as alternatives to traditional vaccines.
The advocacy group warned that such recommendations are particularly dangerous during a time when several states are experiencing measles outbreaks, suggesting that the spread of “misinformation” regarding immunization could have life-threatening consequences for the public.
If Governor DeSantis signs the bill, Florida would shift away from a policy it has held for 67 years. If he issues a veto, the current ban will remain in place, continuing to restrict naturopathic practice within state lines.
Naturopathic medicine is a system of healthcare that emphasizes the use of natural therapies and the body’s self-healing process rather than conventional pharmacological or surgical interventions. It is based on a philosophy that focuses on identifying the root cause of an illness rather than just treating the symptoms.
Core Principles
The practice is guided by several foundational tenets, including:
- The Healing Power of Nature: The belief that the body has an innate ability to maintain and restore its own health.
- First, Do No Harm: Prioritizing the use of low-risk, non-invasive treatments to minimize side effects.
- Doctor as Teacher: Emphasizing education and self-responsibility for health.
- Treat the Whole Person: Taking into account individual physical, mental, emotional, and environmental factors.
Common Treatments and Methods
Naturopathic practitioners typically use a variety of “natural” modalities to manage patient health, which can include:
- Nutritional Counseling: Dietary changes and the use of vitamins or minerals.
- Herbal Medicine: The use of plant-based extracts and supplements.
- Homeopathy: Highly diluted substances intended to trigger a healing response.
- Lifestyle Modification: Strategies for stress management, exercise, and sleep hygiene.
- Physical Medicine: Manual therapies such as massage or joint manipulation.
Regulatory and Educational Context
The legal status of naturopathic medicine varies significantly by jurisdiction. In some regions, practitioners are licensed as Naturopathic Doctors (NDs), having graduated from accredited four-year programs that include basic sciences and clinical training. In other areas, the term is used by “traditional” naturopaths who may not have formal medical schooling.
Because many naturopathic practices—such as homeopathy or the use of “nosodes” (homeopathic vaccines)—lack evidence from large-scale clinical trials, the field is often a subject of debate within the scientific and medical communities regarding its safety and efficacy compared to standard “allopathic” medicine.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox
