Elon Musk has hit a major roadblock in his ongoing legal battle with the federal government over his 2022 acquisition of Twitter. On Tuesday, a D.C. District Court judge flatly rejected Musk’s attempt to throw out a lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), setting the stage for a high-stakes showdown over market transparency and the rights of the world’s wealthiest man.
The case centers on a critical ten-day window in early 2022. The SEC alleges that Musk quietly snapped up a massive amount of Twitter stock, crossing the 5% ownership threshold that legally requires public disclosure.
By failing to announce his stake on time, the SEC argues Musk saved over $150 million by keeping the stock price “artificially low” while he continued to buy.
READ: Ryan Routh Sentenced In Florida To Life In Prison For Trump Assassination Plot
The “Free Speech” Defense Falls Flat
Musk’s legal team didn’t just argue the facts; they went for the jugular, claiming the disclosure laws themselves were unconstitutional. They argued that forcing an investor to reveal their “plans and intentions” violates the First Amendment by compelling speech.
Judge Sparkle Sooknanan wasn’t buying it. In a detailed memorandum opinion, the court ruled that the government has a “substantial interest” in making sure the stock market isn’t a game of secrets played by billionaires. The judge noted that these rules exist to protect everyday investors from being blindsided by “impending corporate takeovers.”
“Business Days” or “Calendar Days”?
In a move some might call “lawyering at its finest,” Musk also tried to argue that the law was too vague. He questioned whether the “10-day” deadline meant calendar days or business days.
The court made short work of that excuse. Judge Sooknanan pointed out that even if you used the more generous “business day” count, Musk was still late. According to the complaint, he hit the 5% mark on March 14 but didn’t come clean to the public until April 4—long after the deadline had passed under any definition.
READ: Sledgehammer Smash And $45K In Swag: St. Petersburg Cops Nab Suspect In Jewelry Heist
What’s at Stake?
The SEC isn’t just looking for a slap on the wrist. They are gunning for:
- Disgorgement: Forcing Musk to hand over the estimated $150 million in profits he allegedly “saved” by delaying his disclosure.
- Injunctions: A permanent order that would essentially put Musk on a shorter leash for future stock trades.
Musk’s team complained that the SEC was “selectively enforcing” these rules against him because of his high profile, but the court found no evidence that he was being treated unfairly compared to others in similar situations.
What’s Next?
With the motion to dismiss denied, the case moves forward. This means we are likely headed for a discovery phase where internal emails and communications between Musk and his wealth managers could be dragged into the light.
For now, the ruling reinforces a simple principle: whether you’re a first-time trader or the CEO of Tesla, the rules of the road for the stock market apply to everyone.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox
