In the wake of the New Year’s Day terror attack in New Orleans, where 14 people were killed and numerous others injured, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) has criticized ongoing efforts to establish a “gun-free zone” in the city’s French Quarter.
The terror attack, involving a truck attack and explosives, has reignited debates over public safety measures and the effectiveness of firearm restrictions.
The attack was carried out by Shamsud Din Jabbar, who drove an electric-powered Ford Lightning pickup truck into a crowd of holiday revelers, causing the majority of the casualties. Jabbar, who was killed in a gunfight with police, was also reportedly armed with a rifle and pistol and had planted improvised explosive devices (IEDs) at the scene.
CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb questioned the logic of creating gun-free zones as a preventive measure against violence. “Alleged mass killer Shamsud Din Jabbar murdered all of his victims with an electric-powered pickup truck,” Gottlieb noted. “Does anyone seriously expect us to believe that designating the area as a ‘gun-free zone’ would have somehow deterred this madman and prevented this horrible crime?”
Gottlieb emphasized that Jabbar’s weapon of choice in the massacre was not a firearm but a vehicle, drawing parallels to similar attacks worldwide. He referenced the 2016 Bastille Day truck attack in Nice, France, which killed 86 people, and a 2017 New York City attack where a rented truck was used to kill eight people on a bike path.
RELATED: Witness Recounts “Surreal” New Orleans Terror Attack Moments
The CCRKBA argues that policies restricting law-abiding citizens from carrying firearms fail to address the root causes of violence. “Dangerous individuals have demonstrated repeatedly they don’t need guns to commit mass murder,” Gottlieb said. He called for a reassessment of strategies that focus on disarming the public, which he described as turning potential victims into “defenseless” targets.
“It’s time to abandon the one-size-fits-all strategy of disarming the public as a solution to violent crime and a preventive measure against wholesale killing,” Gottlieb stated. “You don’t protect people by disarming them. You simply turn them into defenseless victims.”
The New Orleans attack highlights the challenge of preventing mass violence in public spaces. While gun-free zones aim to reduce firearm-related incidents, critics argue that such measures fail to deter determined attackers who can weaponize other means, such as vehicles or explosives.
READ: University Of Georgia Student Critically Injured In New Orleans Terror Attack
The massacre also underscores a growing global trend of mass casualty events involving non-traditional weapons. Authorities and policymakers face increasing pressure to balance public safety with constitutional rights, particularly as debates over Second Amendment protections continue to polarize the nation.
As New Orleans mourns the victims of this devastating attack, discussions about effective safety measures in public spaces are likely to intensify. Advocates like the CCRKBA continue to push for solutions that empower citizens rather than impose restrictions, while others call for stricter controls to address the multifaceted nature of modern violence.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Connect with us: Follow the Tampa Free Press on Facebook and Twitter for breaking news and updates.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox.