A highly influential Democratic law firm has allowed the FBI to operate a workstation at its Washington, D.C., office since the Obama administration.

Rep. Gaetz Among 18 House Republicans Who Reject Democrats’ Efforts To Expand NATO

In the nearly five months since Russia invaded Ukraine, Americans have been consistent about being against sending U.S. troops to the region for a faceoff against Russia.

In the nearly five months since Russia invaded Ukraine, Americans have been consistent about being against sending U.S. troops to the region for a faceoff against Russia.

Yet a strong majority of Congress has supported boosting the risk that Americans could and would one day fight in that part of the world.

The House on Monday overwhelmingly supported welcoming the previously neutral nations of Finland and Sweden into NATO. A resolution pushed by Democrats in favor of that passed 394-18.

The 18 dissenters were all Republicans. U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida was among them.

“Gas is a bazillion dollars… Inflation is over 9 percent… The House is currently voting on how we think other countries should react to our newfound commitment to NATO expansion in Scandinavia,” Gaetz tweeted.

“I’m voting NO.”

According to The Hill, the other Republicans included Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Dan Bishop (N.C.), Lauren Boebert (Colo.), Madison Cawthorn (N.C.), Ben Cline (Va.), Michael Cloud (Texas), Warren Davidson (Ohio), Bob Good (Va.), Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), Morgan Griffith (Va.), Thomas Massie (Ky.), Tom McClintock (Calif.), Mary Miller (Ill.), Ralph Norman (S.C.), Matt Rosendale (Mont.), Chip Roy (Texas) and Jeff Van Drew (N.J.).

In the news: Biden’s Top Economic Advisers Have Nearly Zero Experience In The Business World, And Its Shows

Among those who expressed their reasons for saying no, Massie said he rejected the idea because most of more than two-thirds of NATO countries still have not met the requirement that each nation spend the equivalent of at least 2 percent of its GDP on its own national defense.

“America can’t afford to subsidize socialist Europe’s defense, nor should we,” Massie tweeted.

The other issue is what happens if, or once, Finland and Sweden are accepted. Under NATO’s charter, an attack on one member is considered an attack at all, and thus all are pledged to the mutual defense of another.

This means American troops might one day be dispatched to deal with a Russian invasion, which would not affect the U.S. directly. 

Visit Tampafp.com for PoliticsTampa Area Local NewsSports, and National Headlines. Support journalism by clicking here to our GiveSendGo or sign up for our free newsletter by clicking here

Android Users, Click Here To Download The Free Press App And Never Miss A Story. Follow Us On Facebook Here Or Twitter Here.

Copyright 2022 The Free Press, LLC, tampafp.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement

Login To Facebook From Your Browser To Leave A Comment