supreme court abortion mask mandate hearing law

‘Reproductive Rights Are In Danger’ Abortion Advocates, Dems Melt Down As Supreme Court Reviews Case Challenging Roe v. Wade

Mary Margaret Olohan

daily caller the free press

Abortion advocates and Democrats reacted with anger and fear to news that the Supreme Court would review a case directly challenging aspects of Roe v. Wade, warning that “reproductive rights are in danger.”

The court announced Monday that it will hear Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization beginning in Octoberand a decision on the case will likely come by June 2022, CNBC reported. This will be the first major abortion case in which all three of former President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court justice appointees participate, including Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who gained a seat on the court after a contentious confirmation process in October.

Pro-abortion advocates and commentators were quick to warn that the case could have a tremendous impact on Roe v. Wade, and to predict that Justices Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh would fight to overturn the landmark ruling.

“Never forget that [Senate Minority Leader Mitch] McConnell and others mocked us and gaslit us through the Kavanaugh fight for claiming that legal abortion was in jeopardy,” tweeted National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL) President Ilyse Hogue. “They knew. They lied. We knew. We fought. And we’re so far from done fighting.”

“Whether the Court rules in favor of MS or not, they’re normalizing narrowing the aperture, placing more people who need abortion further from service,” Hogue continued. “They have always understood, sometimes better than people who support Roe, that a right without access is not a right at all.”

Washington Post writer Jennifer Rubin retweeted Hogue’s tweet, adding, “and Sen. [Susan] Collins voted for [Justice Brett] Kavanaugh and [Justice Neil] Gorsuch on the grounds she thought they wouldn’t overturn Roe vs Wade !!!!”

“Gilead’s Supreme Court today began the process that will soon order forced childbirth for any and all women who become pregnant,” filmmaker Michael Moore captioned a Monday Instagram post, referencing the fictional totalitarian government of Gilead in “The Handmaid’s Tale.”

“No word yet on whether Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett have volunteered to physically hold down the women as they are forced to give birth,” he added.

The Women’s March warned in a tweet that the upcoming Supreme Court case is “what conservatives across the country have been rushing to accomplish ever since Amy Coney Barrett joined the Supreme Court.”

“Reproductive rights are in danger,” the Women’s March tweeted. “We can’t let the GOP roll back our rights. It’s time to codify Roe v. Wade.”

The case deals with a 2018 Mississippi law banning abortions after 15 weeks, a law challenged by the Center for Reproductive Rights, the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, and the Mississippi Center for Justice on behalf of the last remaining abortion clinic in Mississippi — Jackson Women’s Health Organization. After the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the law in December 2019, the state of Mississippi asked the Supreme Court to take up the case.

An unborn baby is considered viable at 24 weeks, though medical intervention and a stay in the NICU are usually required this early. Babies born before 23 weeks have a survival rate of about 5% to 6%, and analysis by Charlotte Lozier Institute medical experts found that unborn babies can feel pain as early as 12 weeks.

The Supreme Court will hear one out of the three questions presented by Mississippi, the pro-life group Americans United for Life said in a press release: “Whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional.” This signals that the Court is focused on the constitutionality of legal limits on late-term abortions, AUL said.

“That the Supreme Court is considering this Mississippi law is a promising signal that perhaps a majority of Justices wish to give states greater power to regulate abortion,” Steven H. Aden, AUL Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel, said in a Monday statement. “At the same time, if the Court rejects Mississippi’s common sense HB 1510 protections, the pro-life movement will face a fundamental reckoning.”

Check out the ‘Cancel Corner‘, a new section launched where we report on the latest Cancel Cases and stories from around the globe.

Support journalism by clicking here to our gofundme or sign up for our free newsletter by clicking here

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact


Login To Facebook From Your Browser To Leave A Comment

4 Replies to “‘Reproductive Rights Are In Danger’ Abortion Advocates, Dems Melt Down As Supreme Court Reviews Case Challenging Roe v. Wade”

  1. “Reproductive Rights.” Typical leftist phraseology, take a term that means the opposite declare it to mean that and begin to point fingers at the other side. There is nothing reproductive about abortion, in fact it is the opposite of reproducing, it is extinction of life. Even their pet phrase, “my body, my choice” is used as a cover and has no special significance, see their insistence on masking and vaccination for the CCP corona virus.

  2. When this idiotic judicial precedent gets overturned approx. 20-25 states have triggers to make the execution of unborn children IMMDEIATLY illegal. Then the battle reverts back to the states where it belongs.

  3. Considering the pandemic of illegitimate births I’d say reproduction rights are doing just find. They actually mean right to sacrifice to Baal.

  4. “…A right without access is no right at all.” Hey leftists since planned parenthood gets government money for this “right” that is not articulated anywhere in the constitution…. does this mean I can get government money for my actual articulated rights to bear arms so I can get a gun I can’t afford right now? After all a right without access is no right at all!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.