HomePolitics

Seventeen Red States Band Together To Smash California Plastic Packaging Law In Federal Court

A coalition of 17 states and the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors filed a federal lawsuit on June 22, 2026, seeking to block California’s strict new plastic packaging rules. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, takes aim at the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act. This state law overhauls how consumer products are packaged and recycled across the entire country.

Led by Nebraska Attorney General Michael Hilgers and backed by states including Florida and Texas, the legal challenge targets Zoe Heller, the director of the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, alongside the Circular Action Alliance, a private organization tasked with running the program.

According to the legal complaint, California’s law dictates that any business wanting access to its massive market must alter its packaging designs and logistics models. The act requires a 25 percent reduction in plastic packaging by weight and component by the year 2032, while mandating that all covered materials must be entirely recyclable or compostable in California by that same date.

The plaintiff states argue that the regulations represent “a blatant and unprecedented attempt to impose its own policy preferences on the entire nation.”

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom
Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom

The complaint states that the act “conditions access to California markets on revolutionary changes to the way manufacturers, distributors, and companies (large and small) design and package their products, as well as how plastic or plastic-containing packaging waste is disposed.” The coalition claims this framework violates state sovereignty because California cannot legally project its own laws into other states.

A central point of contention in the lawsuit is California’s decision to hand enforcement and fee-collection powers over to the Circular Action Alliance, a private Producer Responsibility Organization. The lawsuit alleges that this setup creates an unconstitutional delegation of government power to an unaccountable private body whose board includes some of the nation’s largest companies and direct competitors to mid-sized distributors.

The plaintiffs claim the arrangement “allows California to outsource the hard—and inevitably unpopular—work of enforcing the Act to a nongovernmental entity,” while the state collects a “$500,000,000 annual tribute payment extracted by the Circular Action Alliance from its dragooned members.”

The lawsuit also challenges a specific provision of the law that bans businesses from listing the new environmental fees as a separate line item on customer receipts or invoices. The states and trade association argue that this rule directly censors protected speech, keeping consumers in the dark about why product prices are rising.

According to the complaint, this restriction is a “censorship regime” meant to “stymie the efforts of affected entities… to engage in speech designed to rally political opposition and responses to the Act.”

The legal challenge claims the law will inflict significant economic damage far beyond California’s borders. The plaintiffs argue that businesses across the United States will face soaring operational costs, which will drive down taxable income in other states and force price increases on everyday necessities for ordinary consumers. The complaint asserts that “the Act’s inflationary effects will fall especially hard on low-income and otherwise vulnerable Americans.”

The states also noted that their own government agencies, such as prison systems and public health departments, will face millions of dollars in extra expenses for everyday items like single-use plastic food service ware and medical supplies.

The lawsuit asks the federal court to declare the recycling act invalid under both the United States and California Constitutions. It seeks a permanent injunction to completely stop state officials and the Circular Action Alliance from executing or enforcing the packaging mandates and their associated fees.

READ: 8 Years In The Shadows: Connecticut Mom Charged After Newborn Left Alive In Dumpster

Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.

Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox.