Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Asylum and Withholding of Removal for Family Citing Failure to Establish a “Particular Social Group”
In a ruling on Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the petition for review from Erika J. Sierra-Lagos and her son, Jimmy Wualdheim Solorzano-Sierra, who are citizens of Honduras seeking asylum and protection from removal.
The court’s decision affirms the prior rulings of an immigration judge (IJ) and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which found that the petitioners failed to meet the criteria for asylum and other protections.
READ: Judge Dismisses Terrorism Charges In Luigi Mangione Case, But Murder Count Remains
The case centered on the family’s claims for asylum and withholding of removal based on their membership in a “particular social group” (PSG).
Solorzano-Sierra also claimed persecution based on political opinion. The court, in its per curiam opinion, highlighted that the petitioners had abandoned several challenges, including the denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) and Solorzano-Sierra’s political opinion claim.
The court focused on the petitioners’ central argument that the IJ erred by not providing a sufficiently detailed analysis of their claim to be a cognizable PSG.
READ: AG Pam Bondi, DOJ Eyes Office Depot In Kirk Poster Scandal Following Michigan Incident
However, the court found that the petitioners had not properly exhausted this specific argument during their appeal to the BIA, thereby waiving the claim. The court noted that the petitioners’ initial argument to the BIA only concerned whether a “nuclear family” or “family unit” could qualify as a cognizable PSG, not whether the IJ’s analysis was insufficient.
Because establishing a cognizable PSG is a crucial element for a successful asylum or withholding of removal claim, and the petitioners failed to properly contest the IJ’s determination on this point, the court denied their petition for review without addressing their remaining arguments.
The court’s decision underscores the strict procedural requirements in immigration appeals and the need for petitioners to raise and preserve all arguments at each stage of the legal process.
The ruling upholds the denial of asylum and other protections for the Honduran mother and son.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Connect with us: Follow the Tampa Free Press on Facebook and Twitter for breaking news and updates.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox.
