The Texas Supreme Court has ruled against a lower court order that would have allowed a pregnant woman, Kate Cox, to have an emergency abortion.
This decision has sparked outrage and reignited the ongoing fight for reproductive rights in the state.
Kate Cox, a 31-year-old woman from the Dallas-Fort Worth area, found out during her pregnancy that her fetus had been diagnosed with Trisomy 18, a genetic abnormality that often leads to miscarriage or the death of the infant shortly after birth.
Cox and her husband made the decision to seek an abortion to protect her health and future fertility. However, with Texas law regarding abortion, Cox’s case became a battleground for the interpretation.
“A woman who meets the medical-necessity exception need not seek a court order to obtain an abortion,” the court ruling says. “Under the law, it is a doctor who must decide that a woman is suffering from a life-threatening condition during a pregnancy, raising the necessity for an abortion to save her life or to prevent impairment of a major bodily function.”
Related: Less Than Two Years After Dobbs, Abortion Is Headed To The Supreme Court Again
“The law leaves to physicians—not judges—both the discretion and the responsibility to exercise their reasonable medical judgment, given the unique facts and circumstances of each patient.” the court noted.
The court also noted that Cox’s doctor, Damla Karsan, “asked a court to pre-authorize the abortion yet she could not, or at least did not, attest to the court that Ms. Cox’s condition poses the risks the exception requires.”
“These laws reflect the policy choice that the Legislature has made, and the courts must respect that choice,” the court said in its ruling.
The Legal Battle
Cox and her legal team sought a court order to block Texas’ abortion bans from applying to her case. They argued that Cox’s situation qualified for a medical exception under the state’s abortion laws and that she would suffer immediate and irreparable injury without an abortion.
A state district judge granted their request, allowing Cox to have the abortion. However, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton intervened, asking the Texas Supreme Court to overturn the lower court’s ruling.
The Texas Supreme Court’s Decision
In a unanimous ruling, the Texas Supreme Court overturned the lower court’s decision, stating that Cox did not need a court order to obtain an abortion if she met the medical-necessity exception.
The court emphasized that it is the responsibility of physicians, not judges, to exercise their reasonable medical judgment in determining the necessity of an abortion for each patient.
The court found that Cox’s doctor had not provided sufficient evidence to meet the requirements of the exception.
Reactions and Implications
The Texas Supreme Court’s ruling has sparked widespread outrage among advocates for reproductive rights. They argue that Cox’s case demonstrates the flaws in the medical exception and the dangers of living in a state with strict abortion bans.
Nancy Northup, the president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which represented Cox, stated that Cox’s departure from the state to obtain an abortion highlights the difficulties faced by many pregnant individuals who do not have the means to leave the state.
The Impact on Women’s Access to Abortion
This ruling raises concerns about the future of women’s access to abortion in Texas. The state already has two primary laws restricting abortion.
The first law allows private citizens to file civil suits against anyone who performs or aids an abortion after approximately six weeks’ gestation. The second law, known as the trigger law, makes it a felony to perform an abortion from the moment of fertilization. Both laws have limited exceptions for medical emergencies.
The Medical-Necessity Exception Debate
Cox’s case is not the only one challenging the interpretation of the medical-necessity exception. Another ongoing lawsuit in Texas involves a group of women who were denied abortions and are seeking clarification on the types of situations that constitute medical emergencies.
The Texas Supreme Court’s ruling in Cox’s case could potentially impact the outcome of this lawsuit and further shape the interpretation of the medical-necessity exception.
The Future of Reproductive Rights in Texas
The battle for reproductive rights in Texas is far from over. Advocates for reproductive rights continue to fight against restrictive abortion laws and seek to protect women’s access to safe and legal abortions.
The Texas Supreme Court’s ruling in Cox’s case has highlighted the urgency of these efforts and the need for comprehensive reproductive healthcare options for all individuals.
Android Users, Click To Download The Free Press App And Never Miss A Story. Follow Us On Facebook and Twitter. Sign up for our free newsletter.
We can’t do this without your help. Visit our GiveSendGo page and donate any dollar amount; every penny helps.